Cellular
Phone - Just the Facts!
CTIA will require
wireless phone makers to publish the data, known as the Specific
Absorption Rate (SAR), for all phones beginning Aug. 1, 2000.
“
The SAR isn’t appropriate as a safety measure,”
Dr. George Carlo said. Carlo, who headed the independent Radiation
Protection Project because SAR doesn’t measure time
used.
|
|
**
Microwave radiation absorption occurs at the molecular, cellular,
tissue and whole-body levels. The dominant factor for net energy
absorption by an entire organism is related to the dielectric properties
of bulk water, which ultimately causes transduction of electromagnetic
energy into heat."Cooking"
**
Digital cellular telephones transmit information in bursts of power.
The power is turned on and off, and the equipment transmits for
a fraction of the time only and then is silent for the remaining
part of the burst period.
**
In one study, mice genetically altered to be predisposed to developing
one type of cancer developed more than twice (200%) as many such
cancers when they were exposed to RF energy compared to controls.
**
A report prepared by the United Kingdom government's Independent
Expert Group on Mobile Phones (IEGMP) was released on May 11, 2000.
It stated "We conclude therefore that it is not possible at
present to say that exposure to RF radiation, even at levels below
national guidelines, is totally without potential adverse health
effects, and that the gaps in knowledge are sufficient to justify
a precautionary approach." The report presented numerous conclusions
and recommendations, such as discouraging the marketing of mobile
phones to children and their use of them, an investigation into
the health risks associated with the use of hands free headsets,
radiation exposure levels (expressed in SAR's) should appear on
wireless product product packages and literature, the circulation
of pamphlets by the government to every household advising the possible
health risks and new tower approval guidelines. Click here for a
summary of the report and its recommendations.
**
Genetic toxicology studies should focus on single cell gel studies
of DNA strand breakage and on induction of micronuclei. (These are
the only direct genetoxic effects suggested at this time.) The need
to replicate the Lai and Singh experiments used to demonstrate microwave-induced
DNA strand breakage (Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 69:513-521, 1996) is
strengthened by Dr. Lai's recent reports in scientific meetings
that this effort is suppressed by melatonin exposure.
**
In a letter submitted to the U.S. House of Representatives in May
1997, the FDA acknowledged that "Little is known about the
possible health effects of repeated or long-term exposure to low
levels of radiofrequency radiation (RFR) of the types emitted by
wireless communications devices" During February, 2000, the
FDA issued a Nomination reiterating their position, stating "There
is currently insufficient scientific basis for concluding either
that wireless communication technologies are safe or that they pose
a risk to millions of users. A significant research effort, involving
large well-planned animal experiments is needed to provide the basis
to assess the risk to human health of wireless communications devices."
**
Here is what the EPA says about radiation exposure:
"Depending on the level of exposure, radiation can pose a health
risk. It can adversely affect individuals directly exposed as well
as their descendants. Radiation can affect cells of the body, increasing
the risk of cancer or harmful genetic mutations that can be passed
on to future generations; or, if the dosage is large enough to cause
massive tissue damage, it may lead to death within a few weeks of
exposure."Source: EPA 402-F-98-009 May 1998
**
The Chairman of WTR, a wireless industry funded organization, asks
the Chairman of AT&T for assistance to inform consumers about
the potential health risks associated with the use of cellular phones.
**
Bluetooth Specification
The Bluetooth wireless technology standard is a specification for
small form factor, low-cost, wireless communication and networking
between PCs, mobile phones and other electronic products. It has
been adapted for use by more than 1,400 companies.
The maximum frequency for wireless products compliant with the Bluetooth
specification is 2.497 GHz. AegisGuard™ Phone Radiation Shields
include the only shielding technology currently available that deflects
radiation emitted by Bluetooth compliant products.
**
Wireless Industry Wants To Raise Radiation Exposure Limits
Television news shows broadcast in the United States and Western
Europe during the last half of 1999 combined with additional worldwide
news coverage has resulted in increased public awareness about the
health risks associated with radiation emitted by mobile phones.
Government agencies in the United States, such as the FCC, FDA and
US Congress, and agencies in other nations, responded with a series
of long-term initiatives.
During the summer of 1999, Dr. Om Gandhi reported that many mobile
phones exceed current radiation exposure limits in the ear. The
current limits are being debated worldwide because highly respected
scientists believe they are already too high.
Despite Dr. Om's report and numerous studies presenting irrefutable
evidence about the health risks, wireless industry representatives
attending an IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers)
meeting during October, 1999 in Atlanta, Georgia, proposed to the
IEEE's SCC-28 (Standards Coordinating Committee 28), Subcommittee
4 (SC-4) that the current limits be raised. IEEE's SCC-28 encompasses
emission standards from 3 KHz. to 300 GHz.
Representatives from Motorola and Nokia "proposed that for
the general public, the outer ear should be considered an extremity,
similar to the hands, feet, wrists and ankles, and not a vital organ."
The exposure limits for these extremities are higher than the rest
of the body, and they continued with "thus it is not necessary
to protect the outer ear against RF exposure at the same level as
the brain. If the limit for the ear is raised, maximum power of
phones will not be limited unnecessarily."It was reported after
the meeting that the members of SC-4 unanimously supported this
proposal.
**
Patent Applications
Phone manufacturers including Alcatel, Ericsson, Hitachi, Mitsubishi
and NEC applied for patents as early as 1992 that included component
designs to lower radiation health risks using various techniques.
For example, one patent application describes a warning device that
signals the user when the maximum permitted output power is being
approached so they can stop using the phone.
**
U.S. Senate Bill S.800
The U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives passed Bill S.800
on August 5, 1999 and October 14, 1999, respectively, to establish
'911' as the national emergency telephone number.
Entitled the `Wireless Communications and Public Safety Act of
1999', it grants phone carriers and vendors (phone manufacturers
and dealers) the same immunity as wireline carriers for any liability
associated with the use of their products and services.
**
Click here and read the third paragraph of the Bill S.800 Summary.
Then click 'Continue to Section 4" at the end of the paragraph
for the Section in Bill S.800 where vendors are included as "providers
of wireless service" and immunity was granted to them by the
removal of "911" in the Section heading.
**
FDA
U.S. phone safety standards are endorsed by the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC), who admit they "are primarily a regulatory
agency and not an expert on matters pertaining to health and safety."
The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) division
of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for establishing
safety standards and ensuring compliance for radiation emitting
products sold in the U.S. that may endanger public health, yet they
were merely an advisor instead of an authority in any capacity for
cellular phones until October 20, 1999.
On that date, a U.S. nationwide news broadcast exposed information
about cellular phone radiation that resulted in immediate responses
from the FCC, FDA and the cellular industry (CTIA). Despite accusations
that the health effects of cellular phone radiation are being withheld
from consumers by the cellular industry and the government, the
FDA proposed a collaborative project with CTIA to investigate this
issue.
|